12 comments

• [Deleted] commented  ·  March 19, 2013 7:25 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  http://www.mbmavrupakurye.com kurye

• Dan Dascalescu commented  ·  January 29, 2013 8:59 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Two years later and Diigo didn't do shit about this.

  After delicio.us fucked up their design again, I considered (again) moving to Diigo. But if Diigo doesn't give a flying fuck about it users, then I'll be blunt, FUCK YOU Diigo.

• shafiq Akhter commented  ·  July 14, 2012 12:57 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  nice

• Captain Info commented  ·  May 15, 2012 2:58 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  If I could I would spend all of my 50 votes here. C'mon Diigo, pretty please.

• dwarf elf commented  ·  October 15, 2011 3:57 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I too need a lot more characters to fit all my tags per bookmark! Please Diigo, it shouldn't pose a big problem for you to increase to say, 1,000 characters. Or at least double what you have now. Would pay-for-service have a higher number of characters? I would be willing to pay for it, although maybe not pay too much...

• legio1 commented  ·  September 30, 2011 4:26 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  is this change really that hard?

• sqlmashup commented  ·  June 30, 2011 7:39 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  this was the only known downfall of diigo but it nearly swayed me to migrate delicious bookmarks to a competitor

• Médiathèque de l'ITHQ commented  ·  June 28, 2011 12:42 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This is REALLY ridiculous! A HUGE problem!

• Jens Ulrik commented  ·  December 30, 2010 11:46 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Diigo! Wake up! This is a huge error in your import procedure.

• Amara D'Angeli commented  ·  December 26, 2010 11:58 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Along those lines...there seems to be a character or tag limit but there doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to when an entry limits the tag numbers/length of tags.

• ken . commented  ·  December 23, 2010 2:51 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  It appears that Diigo can take 1000 character descriptions, yet the import job truncates them to 256 - perhaps the script needs updated? Can it be run again?

  Same issue logged in bugs forum - http://feedback.diigo.com/forums/76543-bugs/suggestions/1325555-my-bookmarks-tags-imported-from-delicious-but-th

• Dan Dascalescu commented  ·  December 23, 2010 1:32 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Please, PLEASE increase the limit. Delicious already limits me to 1000 characters, and I can cope with that, but 256 is way too little. I've imported a few thousands of bookmarks from Delicious and the notes are all truncated.

  Compare these:

  http://www.diigo.com/user/dandvd/statistics?page_num=5

  and

  http://delicious.com/dandvd/statistics